Essay about Hrm Case Study

Hrm Case Study


Human Resource Management in Hospitality Functions

A review of the important thing policies and practices that Little Chief cook HR office use to obtain service quality

Word Rely: 1812


This academic work talks about the hard and soft types of Human Resource Management (HRM) based on the limited Chef case study which helped to understand and identify the key policies and practices used by Human Resource in order to meet the objective of service quality.

Human Resource Management is defined as a number of ways to people management, Price (2007). Armstrong (2006) supports this view when he says the fact that objective with the human resource management is ensuring the organisation's ability to implement the marketing and sales strategies of the organisation and attain the objective successfully. Yet , the concept HRM is controversial due to numerable theories and different ways of management, says Selling price (2004). By simply critically discussing the hard (Michigan) and smooth (Harvard) models of Human Resource Management towards the ‘Little Chef' case study, the important thing policies and practices used by HRM to get the best service quality can be understood within a better method.

Bizmanualz (2008) states that the duty in the HRM is usually multifunctional as it handles and manages various activities including record keeping, planning, selection, recruitment and dismissal of employees, earnings administration and customer related issues. Quite simply, the main or maybe the only obligation of HRM is making decisions as suggested by Dale (2003) that is crucial and most difficult. The Michigan college consists of several main functions. They are variety, appraisal, benefits and progress human resource. On the other hand, the Harvard model offers importance to shaping employees for the institution (Armstrong, 2006). The Harvard model according to Armstrong (2007) considers the employees as potential assets of the organisation. In accordance to Legge (2005), hard model and this is called because ‘matching model' deals with the policies, devices and activities of the firm.

Contradicting the Harvard type of human resource, among the directors of the Little Gourmet said that the smallest amount of paid personnel of the company is the least important people of the company. In fact the smallest amount of paid employees of an company like that of Little Chef are the kinds who will be in direct touch while using customers. It is they who have keep up and increase the trustworthiness of the company by presenting the service inside the best way likely. The soft model also considers employees as useful assets as it makes use of the employees' commitment, adaptability and good quality to reach the objective of the company, says Legge (2005).

Alternatively, the Michigan model of HRM according to Beardwell and Holden (2001) tries to recruit more staff with the intention of bringing new skills and ideas to the organisation that they can think can help for the betterment of the organisation. Additionally , Gratton ou. al. (1999) say that the hard model of HRM believes in exploiting the talents with the employees to offer the objectives of the organisation.

Tiny Chef becoming a road aspect restaurant certainly will have to deal with lots of customer comments. And this can mostly end up being solved by the least paid staff. Consequently , Little Gourmet has chosen to adopt the Harvard type of human resource. The reason behind it was that it involves associated with employee involvement, cooperation and commitment in corporate, suggests Hyman and Builder (1995). Furthermore, Little Chief cook also tools the strategy of the Michigan model of HRM with the objective of extra productivity from the personnel in the form of effort both intellectually and physically to take competitive advantage over the competitors on the market, states Armstrong (2000). Thus, it can be deducted that Small Chef practises both the Hard model of HRM and Very soft model of HRM in the implementation of their tactics.


Bibliography: Armstrong, Meters. (2000): Ideal Human Resource Management: A Guide to Action. London, uk: Kogan Site.

Armstrong, M. (2006) A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 10th ed. London: Kogan Page Limited.

Armstrong, Meters. (2007) A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 10th ed. London: Kogan Page.

Baum, T. (1995) Managing Human Resources: A Strategic Strategy: In the Euro Tourism and Hospitality Industry, London: Chapman & Hall.

Beardwell, I actually. and Holden, L. (2001) Human Resource Management: A Contemporary Approach, 3 rd ed. Uk: Pearson Education Limited.

Beardwell, We., Hoden, T

Banfield, L and Kay, R. (2008) Introduction to Hrm. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

Bizmanualz (2008) Human Resources Procedures pertaining to Employee Administration.

USA: Bizmanualz.

Boella, M. and Gross-Turner, S. (2006) Human Resource Management in the Hospitality Industry. eighth ed. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

Dale, Meters. (2003): AManager's Guide to Recruiting and Selection. 2nd male impotence.

Davies, G., Taylor, R. and Savery, L. (2001) The Part of Appraisal, Remuneration and Training in Enhancing Staff Associations in the American Australian Lodging Industry: A Comparative Study. Journal of European Industrial Training, vol. 27, pp. 366-373.

Gratton, L., Hailey, V., Stiles, P. and Truss, C. (1999): Ideal Human Resource Management: Corporate Rhetoric and Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Holbeche, T. (1999) Aligning Human Resources and Business Technique. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Hyman, J

Legge, K. (2005) Human Resource Management, Rhetorics and Facts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Value, A. (2004) Human Resource Management within a business framework. 2nd impotence. UK: Thomson

Price, A

Redman, To and Wilkinson, A. (2009) Contemporary Hrm, 3rd education. London: Pearson Education Ltd.

Torrington, M. Hall, M. and The singer, S. (2005) Human Resource Management, 6th ed. Birmingham: Pearson Education Ltd.

Wooden, P. (1997) 360-Degree Opinions. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.