22.08.2019-587 views -Riggs V. Palmer Critaically
In the case of Riggs v. Palmer, the issue at hand is actually or not really Elmer Palmer, a man who have purposely diseased his grand daddy, should be allowed to collect his inheritance. Is it doesn't responsibility of Mr. Palmer's lawyer to provide sound legal advice so that he may make a decision, on his own, as to whether or not he wishes to fight for his inheritance. In order for our legal system to become upheld, and as immoral as it might seem, Mister. Palmer need to receive the funds.
By virtue, laws are intended to be a drafted moral code meant to govern the people that protects. Laws and regulations are crafted as a means of benefiting the greater good of man, and anything which is intended to, whether it works or not, benefit more suitable good can be innately ethical. In the case of Elmer Palmer it is not the law which includes created a great irreversibly immoral situation, is it doesn't lack right now there of.
Legislation, much like morality, is definitely not without flaw. There are laws who's moral intention's are shed in translation, and there are regulations which affect almost every individuals sensibility but have not yet been crafted. There are people who would read the case of Riggs v. Palmer would you be on the side of Mr. Palmer, bridging their hands in hopes that he obtains the money, nevertheless the fact continues to be that a rules is not only a law until it has been created. In the late 1800's when the case took place, right now there simply was not a law declaring that when a beneficiary murders the holder of a will certainly, then that individual should not obtain the contents of that will. In order to preserve the legal system of law, which was created with the best of moral intentions, Mr. Palmer must get the money.
You will find those who may argue that if the law is usually, " not in contract with morality, " it is not only a law whatsoever. If this kind of were the case, then what is to be explained of that which can be moral but is not a regulation, particularly in this instance. It is very clear that Mister. Palmer obtaining the money is usually not moral. The simple presence of morality, regardless of how evident it might appear,...